Internet Shutdown – Coconet https://coconet.social A Platform for Digital Rights Movement Building in the Asia-Pacific Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:21:56 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.1 https://coconet.social/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/favicon-150x150.png Internet Shutdown – Coconet https://coconet.social 32 32 Documenting During Internet Shutdowns: A WITNESS Guide in English and Indonesian https://coconet.social/2020/guide-internet-shutdown-witness/ https://coconet.social/2020/guide-internet-shutdown-witness/#respond Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:12:05 +0000 https://coconet.social/?p=3733 Documenting human rights violations is as important as ever during an internet shutdown. WITNESS Asia writes this guide in English and Indonesian on how activists can safely capture and preserve their videos during an internet shutdown, and even share them offline.

The post Documenting During Internet Shutdowns: A WITNESS Guide in English and Indonesian appeared first on Coconet.

]]>

In January 2020, WITNESS published on its blog an English guide to documenting during internet shutdowns. Almost a year later, all five parts of the guide was made available in Bahasa Indonesia.

Coconet.social is republishing in both English and Bahasa Indonesian the first article of the series. WITNESS Senior Manager of Programs for Asia and Pacific Arul Prakkash, who is also a member of the Coconet community, contributed to the original guide and translation to Bahasa Indonesian. 

Click here to read the article in Indonesian.

Documenting During Internet Shutdowns

In June 2019, as human rights abuses and a humanitarian crisis were continuing in Myanmar, the country’s Ministry of Transport and Communication directed telecom companies to shut down their mobile internet service in parts of Rakhine State and neighbouring Chin State. Citing “disturbances of the peace” and “illegal activities,” the Myanmar government claims to have enacted the shutdown “for the benefit of the people.” In reality, the blackout cut over a million people off from access to essential information and communication and disrupted humanitarian efforts. As Matthew Smith from Fortify Rights has stated, “This shutdown is happening in a context of ongoing genocide against Rohingya and war crimes against Rakhine, and even if it were intended to target militants, it’s egregiously disproportionate.”

The shutdown was partially lifted on five of the townships in September 2019, but is ongoing. During the same month, in neighbouring Bangladesh where many Rohingya have fled, authorities ordered mobile phone operators to block 3G and 4G services in Rohingya refugee camps and to stop selling SIM cards to Rohingya. As we enter 2020, four townships in Rakhine continue to be cut off from the world, and Bangladesh continues to limit service in the refugee camps.

Documenting During Internet Shutdowns

“Internet shutdowns and human rights violations go hand in hand."

Berhan Taye, AccessNow
Globally, internet shutdowns are on the rise. According to AccessNow’s #KeepItOn campaign, there were 128 intentional shutdowns between January – July 2019, compared to 196 in all of 2018, and up sharply from 106 in 2017, and 75 in 2016. Around the world, governments, with the cooperation of telecom companies, are increasingly turning to internet shutdowns as a strategy to repress communities, prevent mobilization, and stop information about human rights violations from being documented and shared. Shutdowns can take various forms, including platform-specific blockages that target popular apps and sites, mobile data shutdowns, bandwidth throttling, or total internet blackouts. All of these types of shutdowns are intended to disrupt the ability to communicate information and expose violations in real-time. They often occur during protests, elections, and periods of political instability, and are often accompanied by heightened state repression, military offensives, and violence. While governments may try to justify shutdowns in the name of “public safety” or other reasons, shutdowns clearly take place at moments when repressive states fear losing tenuous control over their people, information, or political narrative. Shutdowns violate human rights, severely disrupt people’s lives and livelihoods, and also have a global economic impact.
Types of internet shutdowns. Photo from WITNESS, used with permission.

Documenting human rights violations is as important as ever during an internet shutdown. Even if information cannot be shared in the moment, documentation can be a way to preserve voices that authorities are trying to silence and to secure evidence of abuses that can be used to demand accountability later on. Of course, the repressive context and the technological impediments of an internet shutdown make documenting violations—and maintaining that documentation securely—much more challenging and risky. How can activists capture and preserve their videos during a shutdown, and even share them offline, and do so in safer ways? 

This series

Through our work with activists who have experienced internet shutdowns, we have learned some useful tips and approaches to capturing and preserving video documentation during internet shutdowns that we are sharing in this series. We wrote them with Android devices in mind, but the tips can be applied to iPhones as well. Some of the strategies require planning (and often, internet access), so it’s a good idea to review them and implement any steps before you are in a situation where you do not have internet and you need to document. Save a copy of any of the tutorials so you can refer to them or share them during a shutdown. And finally, start practising the techniques and methods in your everyday work so that they become second-nature before you’re in a crisis.

Photo from original guide, used with permission.

One final note: While these tips can help you continue documenting in the face of a shutdown, we want to emphasize that the ultimate solution must be to restore internet access and successfully defend people’s right to record, and freedom of expression, information, and assembly. Fortunately, there is a global movement led by organizations like NetBlocks, AccessNow, and many others who are actively monitoring and sharing information about shutdowns. Advocates globally are engaging in strategic litigation against shutdowns. We stand in solidarity with their work to uphold human rights.

Cara Pendokumentasian Selama Pemadaman Internet

Pada bulan Juni 2019, saat pelanggaran HAM dan krisis kemanusiaan terus berlangsung di Myanmar, Menteri Perhubungan dan Komunikasi negara tersebut memerintahkan perusahaan telekomunikasi untuk memadamkan layanan internet seluler di wilayah Rakhine dan tetangganya Chin. Pemerintah Myanmar mengklaim melakukan pemadaman (shutdown) “untuk kepentingan umum”, menyebutnya sebagai “gangguan pada perdamaian” dan “aktivitas ilegal”. Pada kenyataannya, pemadaman internet terhadap sejuta orang itu memotong akses ke informasi dan komunikasi mendasar  serta mengganggu upaya kemanusiaan. Seperti pernyataan yang disampaikan Matthew Smith dari Fortify Rights, “Shutdown ini terjadi dalam konteks berlangsungnya genosida atas etnis Rohingya dan kejahatan perang terhadap Rakhine, dan bahkan jika ini ditujukan untuk menarget militan, tindakan ini jelas-jelas tidak sesuai proporsi.”

Pemadaman ini dipulihkan sebagian di 5 kota kecil pada September 2019, tapi masih terus berlangsung. Di bulan yang sama, di negeri tetangga Bangladesh di mana banyak suku Rohingya mengungsi, pemangku kekuasaan memerintahkan operator ponsel untuk memblokir layanan 3G dan 4G di kamp pengungsian Rohingya dan berhenti menjual kartu SIM kepada suku Rohingya. Memasuki tahun 2020, 4 kota kecil di Rakhine terus mengalami pemotongan akses dari dunia, dan Bangladesh terus membatasi layanan servis di kamp-kamp pengungsian.

Pendokumentasian Selama Pemadaman Internet

“Pemadaman internet dan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia berjalan beriringan.”

Berhan Taye, AccessNow

Secara global, pemadaman internet terus meningkat. Berdasarkan kampanye #KeepItOn AccessNow, ada 128 pemadaman yang disengaja selama bulan Januari-Juli 2019, dibandingkan dengan total 196 pada 2018, dan meningkat tajam dari tahun 2017 sebanyak 106 pemadaman, dan 75 pada tahun 2016. Di seluruh dunia, pemerintah bersama perusahaan telekomunikasi, melakukan pemadaman internet sebagai strategi untuk menekan masyarakat, mencegah mobilisasi, serta menghentikan penyebaran dan pendokumentasian informasi terkait pelanggaran hak asasi manusia.

Pemadaman internet bisa dilakukan dalam berbagai bentuk, termasuk pemblokiran terhadap platform spesifik yang menargetkan aplikasi dan situs populerpemadaman data selulerpembatasan bandwidth, atau pemadaman total internet. Semua jenis shutdown ini bertujuan untuk mengganggu  penyampaian informasi dan pengungkapan berbagai pelanggaran secara real-time. Hal ini sering terjadi selama unjuk rasa, pemilihan umum, dan periode ketidakstabilan politik, serta seringkali disertai dengan meningkatnya penindasan oleh negara, serangan militer dan kekerasan. Walaupun pemerintah mencoba untuk membenarkan shutdown atas nama keamanan publik atau alasan lainnyashutdown jelas dilakukan pada saat negara takut kehilangan kendali atas masyarakat, informasi, atau narasi politik. Shutdowns melanggar hak asasi manusia, sangat mengganggu kehidupan dan mata pencaharian, serta berdampak pada ekonomi global.

Types of internet shutdowns. Photo from WITNESS, used with permission.

Mendokumentasikan pelanggaran HAM sama pentingnya selama pemadaman internet. Bahkan jika informasi tidak dapat disebarkan pada saat itu, dokumentasi dapat menjadi cara untuk menjaga suara-suara yang berusaha dibungkam pihak berwenang, serta untuk mengamankan bukti pelanggaran yang dapat digunakan untuk menuntut pertanggungjawaban di kemudian hari. Proses pendokumentasian pelanggaran dan upaya menjaga dokumentasi ini tentu saja menjadi lebih menantang dan berisiko karena represi dan hambatan teknologi selama internet shutdownBagaimana para aktivis bisa mengambil dan menyimpan video mereka selama shutdown, membagikannya secara offline dan melakukannya dengan lebih aman?

Dalam Seri Ini

Melalui kerja sama dengan para aktivis yang telah mengalami pemadaman internet, kami mempelajari beberapa tips dan pendekatan yang berguna untuk mengambil dan menyimpan dokumentasi video selama internet shutdown yang akan dibagikan melalui seri ini. Kami menulis tips ini untuk gawait Android, tetapi tips tersebut juga bisa diterapkan untuk iPhone. Beberapa strategi membutuhkan perencanaan terlebih dulu (dan seringkali, akses internet). Jadi sebaiknya baca, coba, dan terapkan dulu sebelum berada dalam situasi di mana sulit mendapatkan akses internet padahal harus melakukan pendokumentasian. Simpan salinan dari setiap tutorial sehingga bisa dirujuk dan dibagikan selama shutdown. Terakhir, mulailah mempraktikkan teknik dan metode berikut dalam kegiatan sehari-hari, sehingga menjadi kebiasaan sebelum berada dalam krisis.

Photo from original guide, used with permission.

Catatan akhir: Meskipun tips tersebut dapat membantu pendokumetasian selama pemadaman internet, kami menekankan bahwa solusi akhir adalah harus memulihkan akses internet dan berhasil membela hak masyarakat untuk merekam, serta kebebasan berekspresi, informasi dan berkumpul. Untungnya, ada gerakan global yang dipimpin oleh organisasi seperti NetBlocksAccessNow dan lainnya yang secara aktif memantau dan berbagi informasi terkait shutdown. Para advokat secara global juga terlibat dalam litigasi strategis terhadap shutdown. Kami berdiri dalam solidaritas dengan kerja-kerja mereka untuk menegakkan hak asasi manusia.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

WITNESS Asia is the Asia-Pacific branch of WITNESS, an international organisation that supports people using video in their fight for human rights. Access more guides on the WITNESS blog.

The post Documenting During Internet Shutdowns: A WITNESS Guide in English and Indonesian appeared first on Coconet.

]]>
https://coconet.social/2020/guide-internet-shutdown-witness/feed/ 0
Statement: Drop charges against students protesting the Myanmar internet shutdown https://coconet.social/2020/myanmar-statement-students/ https://coconet.social/2020/myanmar-statement-students/#respond Thu, 03 Sep 2020 05:34:07 +0000 https://coconet.social/?p=3122 Maung Saungkha and Kyaw Lynn are members of the Coconet community. Prior to his July 27 sentencing, Kyaw Lynn had published on Coconet.social articles on how the Myanmar internet shutdown is contributing to the COVID-19 pandemic and the government’s attempts to censor information on the Arakan (Rakhine) conflicts. Both members were arrested for participating in protests against the internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin states, currently the longest shutdown in the world.

The post Statement: Drop charges against students protesting the Myanmar internet shutdown appeared first on Coconet.

]]>
The following article is a republication of the September 2, 2020 joint statement from seven international human rights organisations calling to drop the charges against activist Maung Saungkha, who is expecting a court verdict tomorrow, September 4.

Maung Saungkha and Kyaw Lynn are members of the Coconet community. Prior to his July 27 sentencing, Kyaw Lynn had published on Coconet.social articles on how the Myanmar internet shutdown is contributing to the COVID-19 pandemic and the government’s attempts to censor information on the Arakan (Rakhine) conflicts. Both members were arrested for participating in protests against the internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin states, currently the longest shutdown in the world.

The statement was originally posted on the Human Rights Watch website and is being shared under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 US license

 


 

The Myanmar authorities should immediately drop the charge against the free-speech activist and poet Maung Saungkha, seven international human rights organizations said today. Police in Yangon charged him on July 7, 2020 with organizing a protest demanding an end to internet restrictions in conflict-affected Rakhine and Chin States. A court verdict is expected on September 4.

The authorities accused Maung Saungkha of hanging a banner reading, “Is the internet being shut down to hide war crimes and killing people?” from an overpass in downtown Yangon on June 21. He faces up to three months in jail and a fine for unauthorized protests under section 19 of the Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law. June 21 was the one-year anniversary of mobile internet shutdowns in parts of Rakhine and Chin States.

“The charges against Maung Saungkha are just the latest example of the Myanmar government’s intolerance of critical speech and peaceful protest,” said Shamini Darshni Kaliemuthu, executive director at FORUM-ASIA. “Instead of prosecuting those peacefully protesting the year-long internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin States, the authorities should uphold free expression rights by ending the shutdown.”

The international human rights groups are Access Now, Amnesty International, Article 19, Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), Civil Rights Defenders, Fortify Rights, and Human Rights Watch.

The current National League for Democracy-led government, which took office in April 2016, has increasingly restricted the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful protest.

On July 27, a court sentenced two student leaders, Myat Hein Tun and Kyaw Lin, to one month each in Yangon’s Insein Prison for failing to give advance notice of a protest on February 23 in Kamaryut township in Yangon. During the protest, the students demanded that the government immediately lift internet restrictions in Rakhine and Chin States and called for accountability of those responsible for the Myanmar military’s alleged shelling of a primary school in Buthidaung township in Rakhine State that had injured 21 students.

On March 25, the court had sentenced seven other students who participated in the protest to one month in prison each with hard labor. All nine students were sentenced under the Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law.

The Peaceful Procession and Peaceful Assembly Law imposes criminal penalties for failing to provide advance notice for an assembly or to comply with broadly worded restrictions on speech and actions at assemblies. The restrictions are contrary to international human rights law, which prohibits criminal penalties for organizing or participating in a peaceful assembly. Imposing prison sentences is particularly harsh in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, when overcrowded and unsanitary prison conditions could facilitate its transmission.

The ongoing mobile internet shutdown in seven townships in Rakhine State and one township in Chin State also violates international human rights law, which requires any internet-based restrictions on communities to be necessary and proportionate. The government first imposed restrictions in nine townships in June 2019, only permitting voice calls and text messages, also known as SMS. The restrictions were temporarily lifted in some areas on September 1, 2019, but the government re-imposed the restrictions on February 3. They were removed in Maungdaw township on May 2, leaving eight townships still under restrictions.

The shutdown enters its second year amid heightened fighting between the Arakan Army, an ethnic Rakhine armed group, and the Myanmar military. Although the Ministry of Transport and Communications announced on June 23 that internet restrictions were provisionally extended only through August 1, 3G and 4G services remain blocked, with only 2G data networks available. The 2G speed is drastically slower and does not allow services such as videocalls, emails, or access to webpages with photos or videos. Restoring full internet access has taken on even more urgency ever since a fresh outbreak of local Covid-19 transmission cases in the State since mid-August.

On August 1, the Norwegian mobile telecommunications provider, Telenor, issued a media release stating that the Ministry of Transport and Communications had directed all mobile operators to extend internet restrictions on 3G and 4G mobile data services in the eight townships until October 31. Telenor expressed deep concern regarding the lack of “meaningful internet services, and for the impact on civilians.”

The Myanmar authorities have also ordered websites of independent and ethnic news media blocked, along with many other sites. The internet restrictions were imposed under section 77 of the Telecommunications Law, which grants the Myanmar authorities broad and arbitrary powers to suspend telecommunications networks. The government had cited a “security requirement and public interest” in its order to telecom companies to reimpose the restrictions, and later cited an escalation in fighting to continue them. The government also offered other rationales including concerns about hate speech, nationalist sentiment, disinformation, the Arakan Army using mobile internet to detonate IEDs and landmines, and “military secrets” online.

The Myanmar authorities should drop the charges against Maung Saungkha and quash the convictions against the nine student activists, the groups said. The government should repeal or amend all repressive laws, including the Telecommunications Law and the Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law, which violate the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.

“Myanmar’s government should restore full internet to the eight townships in Rakhine and Chin States,” said Matthew Bugher, head of Asia Programme, at Article 19. “The lack of meaningful communications or information-sharing capabilities poses further threats to people trapped by fighting amid the Covid-19 pandemic.”

This joint statement is endorsed by:

  1. Access Now
  2. Amnesty International
  3. Article 19
  4. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
  5. Civil Rights Defenders
  6. Fortify Rights
  7. Human Rights Watch

The post Statement: Drop charges against students protesting the Myanmar internet shutdown appeared first on Coconet.

]]>
https://coconet.social/2020/myanmar-statement-students/feed/ 0
#StopInternetShutdownMM: Civil society marks 1 year of world’s longest internet shutdown https://coconet.social/2020/anniversary-myanmar-internet-shutdown/ https://coconet.social/2020/anniversary-myanmar-internet-shutdown/#comments Wed, 24 Jun 2020 01:00:05 +0000 https://coconet.social/?p=1607 This article is a republication of the June 21, 2020 statement of civil society organisations in Myanmar on the year-long internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin states. Chit Hnin Yu from Free Expression Myanmar writes about her thoughts on the internet shutdown and the joint statement.

The post #StopInternetShutdownMM: Civil society marks 1 year of world’s longest internet shutdown appeared first on Coconet.

]]>

This article is a republication of the June 21, 2020 statement of civil society organisations in Myanmar on the year-long internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin states. Chit Hnin Yu from Free Expression Myanmar writes about her thoughts on the internet shutdown and the joint statement:

Last Sunday (June 21, 2020) marked one year since the government shut down the internet in Rakhine and Chin states in Myanmar. Over 1.4 million people still have no access to the internet. They cannot communicate, learn, run their businesses, or get information about COVID-19 in this time. Even though these people are living in conflict areas, they absolutely have the right to access the internet. But the Myanmar government is still extending this shutdown, citing national security as their reason even though they know well this shutdown is a violation on human rights.

Because of this, we from civil society organisations, including local and international organisations and institutions, urge the Myanmar Government to lift internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin States immediately.

Thank you, everyone, for being our strength. I hope we can stand together and show our solidarity on similar and further human rights issues in future.

Statement: Civil society marks 1-year of world’s longest internet shutdown

Today, 21 June, is the first anniversary of the shutdown of all mobile internet access in Myanmar’s Rakhine and Chin States. This is the longest internet shutdown in the world. Approximately 1.4 million people in eight townships in those States are suffering from the ongoing violation of their economic, social, cultural, developmental, political, and civil rights.

The Myanmar government has claimed the shutdown is for national security. However, there has been no evidence that the decision has reduced the ongoing conflict. Instead, it has caused significant harm to civilians in one of the least developed regions of Myanmar, during the global COVID-19 pandemic. It has been internationally condemned as disproportionate, including by the UN.

We condemn the continued shutdown and call on the government to immediately lift all restrictions on internet access and to restore telecommunications unconditionally to full capacity. We also call on the government to:

  • Immediately reinstate access to the internet in the remaining eight townships in Rakhine and Chin States
  • Review Articles 77 and 78 and other Articles of the 2013 Telecommunication Law, and amend them to be in line with human rights standards
  • Refrain from restricting internet access and bandwidth restrictions in the future, either in these currently affected areas or elsewhere in Myanmar, including in other conflict areas, and during periods of elections.

ယနေ့ ဇွန်လ (၂၁) ရက်နေ့သည် ရခိုင်နှင့် ချင်းပြည်နယ်တို့တွင် မိုဘိုင်းအင်တာနက်ဆက်သွယ်မှု စတင် ဖြတ်တောက်ခံရမှုသည် တစ်နှစ်ပြည့် နှစ်ပတ်လည် အထိရောက်ရှိလာပြီဖြစ်သည်။ ဤအင်တာနက် ဖြတ်တောက်ခံရမှုသည် လက်ရှိတွင် ကမ္ဘာ့အရှည်ကြာဆုံးသော အင်တာနက်ဖြတ်တောက်မှုဖြစ်ကာ အဆိုပါပြည်နယ်များရှိ မြို့နယ် (၈) မြို့နယ်မှ ၁.၄ သန်းခန့်သော ဒေသခံပြည်သူတို့သည် ၎င်းတို့၏ စီးပွားရေး၊ လူမှုရေး၊ ယဉ်ကျေးမှု၊ ဖွံ့ဖြိုးတိုးတက်မှု၊ နိုင်ငံရေး နှင့် နိုင်ငံသား အခွင့်အရေးများအား ချိုးဖောက်ခံရခြင်းကို ကြုံတွေ့ခံစားနေကြရသည်။

မြန်မာအစိုးရသည် အင်တာနက်ဖြတ်တောက်မှုအား နိုင်ငံတော်လုံခြုံရေးအတွက်လုပ် ဆောင်ခြင်းဖြစ်သည်ဟု ဆိုခဲ့ပါသည်။ သို့ရာတွင်မူ ထိုသို့လုပ်ဆောင်ခြင်းသည် ယခုဖြစ်ပွားလျက်ရှိသော ပဋိပက္ခအား လျော့ပါးသွားစေသည်ဟူသော အထောက်အထား မတွေ့ရှိရပေ။ ထိုဖြတ်တောက်မှုသည် မြန်မာနိုင်ငံ၏ ဖွံ့ဖြိုးတိုးတက်မှုနောက်အကျဆုံးသော ဒေသများတွင်ရှိသော ဒေသခံလူထုအား ယခုဖြစ်ပွားနေသော COVID-19 ကမ္ဘာ့ကပ်ရောဂါကာလအတွင်းတွင် ဆိုးရွားသောထိခိုက်မှုများကို ကြုံတွေ့စေသည်။ ထိုသို့ လုပ်ဆောင်ခြင်းသည် သင့်လျော်မှုမရှိကြောင်း ကုလသမဂ္ဂအပါအဝင် နိုင်ငံတကာမှ ရှုံ့ချခဲ့ကြသည်။

သို့ဖြစ်ပါ၍ ကျွန်ုပ်တို့သည် ဆက်လက်ဖြစ်ပွားနေသော အင်တာနက်ဖြတ်တောက်မှုအား ရှုံ့ချလိုက်ကာ အစိုးရအား ကန့်သတ်ပိတ်ဆို့မှုများအား ချက်ချင်းရုတ်သိမ်းပြီး စွမ်းရည်ပြည့်ဝသော ဆက်သွယ်ရေးလိုင်း များအား အကန့်အသတ်မရှိ ပြန်လည်တည်ဆောက်ပေးရန် တိုက်တွန်းတောင်းဆိုလိုက်သည်။ ထို့အပြင် ကျွန်ုပ်တို့သည် အစိုးရအား အောက်ပါအချက်များကိုလည်း တောင်းဆိုပါသည်။

  • အဆိုပါ မြို့နယ် ၈ မြို့နယ်ရှိ မိုဘိုင်းအင်တာနက်လိုင်းများကို ခြွင်းချက်မရှိ စွမ်းအားပြည့် ချက်ခြင်းပြန်ဖွင့်ပေးရန်
  • ၂၀၁၃ခုနှစ် ဆက်သွယ်ရေးဥပဒေ၏ ပုဒ်မ ၇၇ နှင့် ၇၈ တို့အား ပြန်လည်သုံးသပ်ရန်နှင့် ၎င်းတို့အား လူ့အခွင့်အရေးစံနှုန်းများနှင့်အညီ အမြန်ဆုံး ပြင်ဆင်ရန်။
  • အနာဂတ်တွင်နှင့် လာမည့်ရွေးကောက်ပွဲကာလများတွင်လည်း ယခုအင်တာနက် ဖြတ်တောက်ခံ ထားရသော ဒေသများတွင် သော်လည်းကောင်း၊ မြန်မာတစ်နိုင်ငံလုံးရှိ လက်နက်ကိုင်ပ ဋိပက္ခဖြစ်ပွားသည့် အခြားဒေသများ အပါအဝင် ကျန်ဒေသများတွင်သော်လည်းကောင်း ယခုကဲ့သို့ အင်တာနက်ဆက်သွယ်ရေးစနစ်ဖြတ်တောက်ခြင်းများနှင့် အင်တာနက်နှုန်းလျော့ချခြင်းများ အား(လုံးဝ) မပြုလုပ်ရန်။

Signed:

  1. Access Now (International)
  2. Action Committee for Democracy Development (ACDD)
  3. Action For Dignity and Development(ADD)
  4. Action Labour Rights
  5. Advocacy Initiative for Development (AID)
  6. AfroLeadership (International)
  7. African Freedom of Expression Exchange (International)
  8. Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (International)
  9. All Arakan Students’ and Youths’ Congress (AASYC)
  10. Araken CSO Network
  11. Arakan League for Democracy (KyaukPyu)
  12. Arakan Rivers Network (ARN)
  13. Association of Human Rights Defenders and Promoters (HRDP)
  14. Association for Progressive Communications (APC – International)
  15. Athan – Freedom of Expression Activist Organization
  16. Blue Moose Publications (UK)
  17. Burma News International (BNI)
  18. C.A.N-MYANMAR and PFLAG-MYANMAR
  19. Campaign for Human Rights and Development International (CHRDI – Sierra Leone)
  20. Center for Environment and Resources Development in Arakan (CERDA)
  21. Centre for Law and Democracy (International)
  22. Center for Media Studies and Peacebuilding (CEMESP – Liberia)
  23. Charity Youths Organization
  24. Chin CSOs Forum
  25. Chin Youth Network
  26. Chinland Heritage
  27. Citizen Right Action Group – CRAG
  28. Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
  29. Myanmar Consumers Union (MCU)
  30. Dr. Saw Mra Aung Foundation
  31. Electronic Frontier Foundation (International)
  32. Equality Myanmar
  33. Ethnic Concern
  34. Free Expression Myanmar (FEM)
  35. Free Media Movement (FMM – Sri Lanka)
  36. Future Young Pioneer Organization (FYPO)
  37. Gender and Development Advocates (GANDA – Philippines)
  38. Genuine People’s Servants (GPS)
  39. Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA)
  40. Human Rights Foundation of Monland
  41. Human Rights Watch (International)
  42. Kadu Youth Development Association (KYDA)
  43. Impact Terra
  44. Ingyinmay Hindu Women Association
  45. Internet Freedom Foundation (India)
  46. International Federation of Journalists (IFJ – international)
  47. Internet Protection Society (Russia)
  48. Internet Sans Frontières (International)
  49. Justice Base
  50. Kadu Youth Development Association
  51. Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet)
  52. MATA Chin
  53. Media Foundation for West Africa (International)
  54. Mi Organization
  55. Mong Pan Youth Association
  56. Mon Women’s Organization
  57. Myanmar ICT for Development Organization (MIDO)
  58. Myanmar Centre for Responsible Business (MCRB)
  59. Myanmar Consumers Union
  60. Myanmar Journalist Network
  61. Nam Khone Alumni Network
  62. Open Net Korea (South Korea)
  63. Oway Education and Youth Institution
  64. Pakokku Youth Development Council (PYDC)
  65. PEN America (International)
  66. PEN Myanmar
  67. Phandeeyar
  68. Project Lockdown
  69. Rain Maker
  70. Rakhine Lives Matter
  71. Rakhine Youth New Generation Network
  72. Right 2 Know Campaign (South Africa)
  73. ROAD ( Remove Obstructions Against Democratization)
  74. Search for Common Ground (SFCG – International)
  75. SKY-Youth(KyaukPhyu)
  76. Social, Education and Development Association – SEDA
  77. Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC – India)
  78. Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network (SAFEnet – Indonesia)
  79. Swe Tha Har Organization
  80. Tampadipa Institute
  81. Tara Foundation
  82. Theikkhar Myanmar Institute
  83. Thint Myat Lo Thu Myar ( Peace Seekers and Multiculturalist Movement)
  84. Thuriya Sandra Environmental Watch Group
  85. Twel Let Myanmar
  86. Union of Karenni State Youth (UKSY)
  87. Unwanted Witness (Uganda)
  88. Utopia Association
  89. Witness (International)
  90. World Bank (international)
  91. Yangon Film School
  92. Yaung Chi Thit (YCT)
  93. Yed
  94. Yemeni Organization for Development and Exchange of Technology (YODET – Yemen)
  95. ကျောင်းသားသမဂ္ဂ တောင်ကုတ်ဒီဂရီကောလိပ်
  96. ကမ်းထောင်းကြီး လူငယ်မျိုးဆက်သစ်
  97. စာပေဥယျာဉ် ဘူးသီးတောင်
  98. ပေါင်းစည်းအားမာန်ဖွံ့ဖြိုးရေးအသင်း
  99. တောင်ကုတ်လူငယ်ကွန်ရက်
  100. မရာမာကြီးလူငယ်များ ကွန်ရက်
  101. မြိုလူငယ်များ ဖွံ့ဖြိုးတိုးတက်ရေးအဖွဲ့
  102. မြောက်ဦးလူငယ်များ အစည်းအရုံး
  103. ဘဝအားမာန် အသင်း
  104. ရခိုင့်မျိုးဆက်သစ် အမျိုးသမီးများ အဖွဲ့
  105. ရခိုင်လူငယ်များစွမ်းရည်မြှင့်တင်ရေးအဖွဲ့
  106. ရခိုင်လူငယ်မျိုးဆက်သစ်အဖွဲ့
  107. ရမ်းဗြဲမြို့နယ် လူငယ်များကွန်ရက်
  108. ရသေ့တောင်မြို့နယ် လူငယ်ကွန်ရက်
  109. သန္တာရင်သွီး လူငယ်ပရဟိတ အသင်း
  110. သက်လူငယ်များကွန်ရက်
  111. အစိမ်းရောင်ဘဝများ
  112. အုန်းတော ပရဟိတ ဖောင်ဒေးရှင်း
  113. အမ်းလူငယ်မျိုးဆက်သစ်
  114. အနောက်တံခါး လူငယ်အဖွဲ့
  115. မဂျူလိုင်မိုး (တစ်ဦးချင်း)
  116. ကိုညီညီလှိုင် (တစ်ဦးချင်း)
About the Author/s

Chit Hnin Yu is the digital rights officer of Free Expression Myanmar and one of the contact persons for further information on this joint statement. Aside from Yu, you may also contact Svetlana Zens of the Myanmar Centre for Responsible Business, Htaike Htaike Aung of MIDO, and Wai Phyo Myint of Phandeeyar.

For more information on the internet shutdown and what is being done to combat it, visit the Free Expression Myanmar website. You can also check out previous Coconet.social blog posts on the topic of Myanmar by student leader Kyaw Lynn. 

The post #StopInternetShutdownMM: Civil society marks 1 year of world’s longest internet shutdown appeared first on Coconet.

]]>
https://coconet.social/2020/anniversary-myanmar-internet-shutdown/feed/ 1
Pemblokiran Internet di Papua dan Papua Barat vs Kelanjutan Putusan Majelis Hakim PTUN Jakarta https://coconet.social/2020/papua-pemblokiran-internet-indonesia/ https://coconet.social/2020/papua-pemblokiran-internet-indonesia/#respond Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:25:29 +0000 https://coconet.social/?p=1487 Awal bulan Juni 2020, Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) menyatakan Pemerintah Indonesia, dalam hal ini Presiden RI dan Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informasi (Menkominfo), telah melanggar hukum atas tindakan pelambatan (throttling) dan pemblokiran internet di beberapa wilayah di Papua dan Papua Barat pada tahun 2019. Kasus yang terjadi selama kurang lebih satu bulan dari tanggal 19 Agustus hingga 28 September 2019 ini diajukan ke PTUN oleh koalisi kelompok masyarakat sipil yang ada di Asia Tenggara. Kemenangan Tim Pembela Kebebasan Pers atas gugatan pada Menkominfo dan Presiden RI, menjadi contoh baik menyikapi cara pemerintah menerapkan otoritasnya dalam pengelolaan Internet.

The post Pemblokiran Internet di Papua dan Papua Barat vs Kelanjutan Putusan Majelis Hakim PTUN Jakarta appeared first on Coconet.

]]>

“Kenapa Jaringan Internet Di Putus? (red)” Ditangkap dari video Pemutusan Jaringan Internet di Papua dari West Papua Updates (WPU), digunakan dengan izin WPU.

Read this article in English

Awal bulan Juni 2020, Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) menyatakan Pemerintah Indonesia, dalam hal ini Presiden RI dan Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informasi (Menkominfo), telah melanggar hukum atas tindakan pelambatan (throttling) dan pemblokiran internet di beberapa wilayah di Papua dan Papua Barat pada tahun 2019. Kasus yang terjadi selama kurang lebih satu bulan dari tanggal 19 Agustus hingga 28 September 2019 ini diajukan ke PTUN oleh koalisi kelompok masyarakat sipil yang ada di Asia Tenggara.

Kemenangan Tim Pembela Kebebasan Pers atas gugatan pada Menkominfo dan Presiden RI, menjadi contoh baik menyikapi cara pemerintah menerapkan otoritasnya dalam pengelolaan Internet. Proses yang panjang, mulai dari pertemuan tatap muka dengan Kemkominfo, memenangkan petisi daring, rupanya masih harus dibawa ke jalur hukum.

Putusan ini menjadi sangat penting mengingat selama ini, kebebasan pers dan kebebasan berekspresi di dalam maupun tentang Papua berada dalam status quo narasi hiper nasionalisme. Narasi ini memaksa Papua untuk tunduk pada Indonesia dan menuduh semua upaya untuk membela hak-hak warga Papua, serta protes terhadap rasisme dan diskriminasi yang mereka alami, sebagai “separatis”.  Pada akhirnya, pemblokiran internet ini adalah upaya untuk membungkam protes melawan rasisme dan diskriminasi terhadap warga Papua.

Pemblokiran Internet pada 2019

Pemblokiran internet di Papua dan Papua Barat bukanlah kali pertama bagi pemerintah Indonesia. Sepanjang 2019, Indonesia telah mengalami beberapa kali situasi pelambatan Internet, khususnya untuk mengakses layanan media sosial seperti Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, dan Instagram.

Setidaknya ada dua kejadian yang melatari diputusnya akses komunikasi melalui Internet di Papua dan Papua Barat dalam kurun waktu tersebut, yakni pengepungan Asrama Mahasiswa Papua di Surabaya dan tindakan rasis lain di Malang, dan meningkatnya ketegangan dalam aksi-aksi anti rasisme di Papua dan Papua Barat karena reaksi aparat keamanan.

Namun, dalam siaran persnya Kemkominfo maupun Sekretariat Kabinet [Setkab] RI, beralasan, blokir akses Internet adalah langkah menekan “penyebaran hoaks dan provokasi”.

Melalui Siaran Pers No. 106HM, Rudiantara yang menjabat Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika/Menkominfo RI saat itu menyatakan, pembatasan didasarkan pada UU ITE, yakni mengenai manajemen konten.

Kejadian ini dilatari pengumuman hasil Pemilihan Presiden 2019. Pengguna media sosial aktif Indonesia turut menyemarakkan protes warganet terhadap keputusan pemerintah.

Selanjutnya, dalam siaran pers 27 Mei 2019, Rudiantara menyebutkan tiga langkah yang dilakukan pemerintah, antara lain:

  1. Menutup akses tautan konten atau akun yang terindikasi menyebarkan hoaks
  2. Bekerja sama dengan penyedia platform digital untuk menutup akun
  3. Membatasi akses terhadap sebagian fitur platform digital atau berbagi file

Tak hanya melalui Kemenkominfo, Menteri Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum, dan Keamanan Wiranto pun menyatakan telah membatasi akses media sosial untuk pengguna internet di Indonesia.

Setelah Putusan, Lalu Apa?

Seiring dukungan yang menguat terhadap penegakan HAM di Indonesia, ancaman terhadap pers dan pembela HAM meningkat.

Tindakan pelambatan dan pemblokiran internet di Papua dan Papua Barat ini selain mengancam salah satu pilar demokrasi, masih ditambah dengan tingginya nilai kerugian akibat pembatasan dan pemblokiran Internet di Papua dan Papua Barat, yakni sekitar Rp 2,6 Triliun.

Kemenangan Tim Pembela Kebebasan Pers adalah bukti konsistensi masyarakat sipil dan pers memperjuangkan hak-hak digital warga negara, khususnya dalam mengakses informasi dan hak atas rasa aman.

Menanggapi putusan ini, pemerintah Indonesia menyatakan bahwa mereka akan berkonsultasi terlebih dahulu dengan kuasa hukum dari pemerintah. Oleh karena itu, mari kita kawal putusan majelis hakim PTUN Jakarta, Rabu, 3 Juni 2020, yang menyatakan Menkominfo dan Presiden RI telah melakukan perbuatan melanggar hukum dengan memperlambat dan memutus akses Internet di Papua dan Papua Barat pada Agustus dan September 2019.

About the Author

Artikel ini ditulis dan diedit oleh Fendi Widianto, Nikholas Borang, Pitra Hutomo, dan Kathleen Azali dari EngageMedia. Untuk mengetahui lebaih banyak cerita tentang Papua dan Papua Barat, silahkan kunjungi PapuanVoices.net.

The post Pemblokiran Internet di Papua dan Papua Barat vs Kelanjutan Putusan Majelis Hakim PTUN Jakarta appeared first on Coconet.

]]>
https://coconet.social/2020/papua-pemblokiran-internet-indonesia/feed/ 0
Monitoring the ruling vs 2019 internet shutdowns in Papua and West Papua https://coconet.social/2020/papua-internet-shutdown-indonesia/ https://coconet.social/2020/papua-internet-shutdown-indonesia/#comments Fri, 12 Jun 2020 06:01:03 +0000 https://coconet.social/?p=1475 Earlier this month, the Jakarta State Administrative Court declared as illegal the internet shutdowns in Papua and West Papua enforced by the Indonesian government in 2019. The case on the month-long shutdown, from August 19 to September 28 last year, was filed by a coalition of civil society groups working in Southeast Asia. The victory of the Press Freedom Defender Team over the lawsuit against the Minister of Communication and Information and the President of the Republic of Indonesia, is a good example of how citizens can respond to government’s unlawful management of public communication infrastructure like the Internet.

The post Monitoring the ruling vs 2019 internet shutdowns in Papua and West Papua appeared first on Coconet.

]]>

“Why was our Internet connection shut down? (edited)” Screengrab from the video “The Internet Shutdown in Papua”  by West Papuan Updates, used with permission.

Baca artikel ini dalam Bahasa Indonesia

Earlier this month, the Jakarta State Administrative Court declared as illegal the internet shutdowns in Papua and West Papua enforced by the Indonesian government in 2019. The case on the month-long shutdown, from August 19 to September 28 last year, was filed by a coalition of civil society groups working in Southeast Asia. Part of the coalition is SAFEnet, which was present at the Coconet digital rights camp.

The victory of the Press Freedom Defender Team over the lawsuit against the Minister of Communication and Information and the President of the Republic of Indonesia, is a good example of how citizens can respond to government’s unlawful management of public communication infrastructure like the Internet. The long process, starting from the face-to-face meeting with the Ministry of Communication and Information, to creating an online petition, eventually had to be brought to a legal route. The Press Freedom Defenders Team includes SAFEnet, which was present at the second Coconet digital rights camp.

The ruling is also even more important in the context of debates in freedom of the press and freedom of expression in and about Papua are framed within the hyper-nationalism narrative of the status quo. After all, the shutdown was implemented to quell the protests against racism and discriminations of Papuans.

Internet bans in 2019

The internet shutdown in Papua and West Papua was not the only time the Indonesian government banned access to the internet. Throughout 2019, the Indonesian government implemented a number of internet throttling and blocking in the country – particularly in accessing social media services such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, and Instagram.

In the case of Papua and West Papua, there were at least two incidents that laid the ground for Internet access restriction during this period. One is the siege of the Papuan Student in a dormitory in Surabaya and other racist acts in Malang, and the second is the increased tension in anti-racism demonstrations in Papua and West Papua, which was met with excessive force carried out by the security apparatus.

The Indonesian Ministry of Communication and Informatics and the Cabinet Secretary, in eleven press releases, stated that the Internet access blocking was a way to quell “the spread of hoax and provocations”.

This internet throttling was also preceded by a previous incident: On May 22, 2019, the Ministry of Communication and Informatics came out with a press release titled the “Throttling of Some Social Media and Instant Messaing Platforms”. The head of the ministry, Rudiantara, stated that the throttling was done based on the ITE (electronic information transaction) Law, specifically on content management.

This internet throttling was triggered by the announcement of the 2019 Presidential Election results in April 2019.

In another press release, Rudiantara outlined the three steps in which the Indonesian government implemented the throttling:

  1. Block access to content links or accounts that had been indicated to spread hoaxes
  2. Work closely with digital platform providers to close accounts
  3. Limit access to some digital platform features or file sharing

Aside from the Ministry of Communication & Informatics, the Coodinating Minister of Politics, Law and Security, Wiranto, also stated that the government had limited the access to social media to internet users in Indonesia.

A number of active social media users in the archipelago, reportedly reaching up to 150 million or 3/4 of the total population, expressed their protests against government decisions.

What’s next after the ruling?

As more support for human rights gains traction, threats towards the press and human rights defenders have also spiked.

The internet throttling in Papua and West Papua, which threatens one of the main pillars of democracy, is compounded by the high value of losses estimated to be around IDR 2.6 trillion (USD 184 million).

The ruling, a definite victory for the Press Freedom Defenders Team, demonstrates the persistence of civil society and the press in fighting for citizens’ digital rights, especially in accessing information and the right to security.

In response to the ruling, the Indonesian government stated that they will consult with the state legal team to decide the next step. But while the ruling has been made, let’s still monitor the Indonesian government’s response to their violation of the law.

About the Author

This article was written and edited by EngageMedia’s Fendi Widianto, Nikholas Borang, Pitra Hutomo, and Kathleen Azali. For more stories on Papua and West Papua, visit PapuanVoices.net.

The post Monitoring the ruling vs 2019 internet shutdowns in Papua and West Papua appeared first on Coconet.

]]>
https://coconet.social/2020/papua-internet-shutdown-indonesia/feed/ 2
To fight COVID-19 in Myanmar, stop the war and internet shutdown in Arakan https://coconet.social/2020/myanmar-rakhine-arakan-internet-shutdown-covid/ https://coconet.social/2020/myanmar-rakhine-arakan-internet-shutdown-covid/#comments Wed, 22 Apr 2020 01:00:03 +0000 https://coconet.social/?p=1124 The internet is a primary source of information on the global COVID-19 pandemic. But Arakan (formally known as Rakhine State) in western Myanmar is now experiencing the longest internet shutdown in the world. The internet blockage has also caused a lack of information and knowledge concerning COVID-19.

The post To fight COVID-19 in Myanmar, stop the war and internet shutdown in Arakan appeared first on Coconet.

]]>

The internet is a primary source of information on the global COVID-19 pandemic. But Arakan (formally known as Rakhine State) in western Myanmar is now experiencing the longest internet shutdown in the world. Arakan is the second poorest area in Myanmar, with very weak health infrastructure in place. The internet blockage has also caused a lack of information and knowledge concerning COVID-19.

The first internet shutdown started in June 21, 2019, in four townships in northern Arakan. Another five townships (one in neighboring Chin State) followed in February 3, 2020. This coming April 21, it will be approximately 330 days since the first four areas have been without internet, while it will be nearly 100 days for the latter townships.

The government has given different reasons for the shutdown, such as the stopping of the hate speech, disinformation, and instability due to conflict in the area. None of these are justifiable.

The situation in Rakhine

Although the world is now fighting against COVID-19, over one million people in northern Arakan are still being neglected by the government action plan. As of April 19, Myanmar now has 107 positive cases and five deaths attributed to the coronavirus. The Myanmar government has not announced any case from Arakan. But this number is in danger of ballooning. Arakan is very close to Bangladesh, where there are a reported 2,456 positive cases and 91 deaths as of the same date. But if not addressed, Arakan will remain very prone to local transmissions in the border area.

The internet blockage has caused a lack of information and knowledge concerning COVID-19.

But different from most other parts of the world, the armed conflict is still ongoing in the region between the government’s Myanmar Army and the Arakan Army, despite the latter’s announced unilateral ceasefire until the end of April upon the recommendation of a global ceasefire by the UN Secretary-General. Instead, according to most analysts, the Myanmar Army is trying to take military advantage in Arakan by imposing more offensive military operations and leading to more innocent civilian deaths. Since the beginning of January to April 15 of this year, the Arakan Information Center reports that 377 civilians have died, injured, and disappeared. Most of them are women and children.

The conflict has resulted in about 200,000 internally displaced persons (IDP) in the region are also living in camps without any well-built shelter and well-managed food distribution. The lack of social distancing in the IDP camps, the lack of water availability, and the lack of information on COVID-19 make it impossible to prevent a coronavirus outbreak in the area.

Unfortunately, what makes the people to be more fearful is the military attack on the civilian target rather than COVID-19. It seems the Myanmar government and military are more enthusiastic to fight against the Arakan Army than COVID-19 in the region. But under these three situations – internet shutdown, IDP camps, and ongoing armed conflict – it is unimaginable how the situation could be worse in the future if COVID-19 were to hit Arakan.

Stop war and internet shutdown

During the global pandemic period, we need to stop the war and internet shutdown to fight COVID-19 in Arakan.

I am one of those people speaking out, even if I am currently now hiding from police search. On February 23, 2020, in Yangon, I led the Students’ Unions’ protest and demonstration against the internet shutdown and human rights violations in the conflict-affected areas of Arakan. I could be prisoned for one month with hard labor if I face the trial.

But it is just my case. The more important thing to focus on is to fight against the COVID-19. Over one million people in Arakan are vulnerable to the disease if we do not stop the war and internet shutdown.

Mrauk_U,_Rakhine_State_01
Mrauk U township in Rakhine State (Arakan) is one of the nine townships in Myanmar that still do not have internet access to this day. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Thus, let us say: Stop the war and internet shutdown to fight against the COVID-19 in Arakan. Your participation is our power. Your concentration is our courage. Your word is our want.

About the Author

Kyaw Lynn is currently a postgraduate student taking his master’s degree in political science at the University of Yangon, Myanmar. He is the chairperson of Political Science Association (University of Yangon) as well as the principal officer at Arakan Students Union (Universities-Rangoon). 

The post To fight COVID-19 in Myanmar, stop the war and internet shutdown in Arakan appeared first on Coconet.

]]>
https://coconet.social/2020/myanmar-rakhine-arakan-internet-shutdown-covid/feed/ 4